the waiter wanted to bring her a Shirley Temple or Coca-Cola with her meal.â
Sharon laughed. âI had some time!â She wrinkled her nose. âUnfortunately, they never ask any more.â¦â
âNobody asked him for identification. If youâd seen him, youâd know why. I never actually saw him myself, but Iâve got his statistics here, and theyâre impressive. He was a big kid, and I imagine heâs a big man now,â Steve said.
âOkay,â Ross said, and looked at his watch. âLetâs get on.â
âRight. In any event, Dupaul had a drink at the hotel bar and then went out on the town. He stopped at a place called Marcoâs on Lexington near Eighty-fifth and had a couple of drinks there. The bartender says he was talking to some character and then wandered out. The bartender also said it was a good thing he did, because in his state he wouldnât have served him any more. Then, about twenty minutes to a half hour later, according to the timetable established, he was in a spot called the Mountain Topâitâs actually in a basementâon Fifty-fourth between Seventh and Eighth.â
âQuite a distance,â Ross commented, and frowned. âOdd.â
âPlenty of time to get there, especially in a cab.â
âI donât mean that. Usually, when a person goes out on a binge, or even a simple, everyday pub crawl, he sticks to bars that are fairly close to one another. He doesnât jump around. He doesnât take cabs. There are certainly enough bars around Eighty-sixth and Lexington to satisfy the most demanding thirst.â He frowned and looked up from the pencil he had been twiddling. âDid Billy Dupaul claim to have any particular reason for going over to this Mountain Top Bar?â
âThereâs nothing about it in the transcript.â
âSharon, make a note of that. All right, Steve, what happened next?â
Steve Sadler shuffled some papers together, straightened his glasses, and shook his head.
âIâm going to have to give you two different stories now, Hank: the one told by Dupaul on the stand and the one told by Neeley. What Iâll be giving you now will really be the summation of many transcripts of testimony, together with the conclusions drawn from this testimonyânot conclusions on my part, but on the part of the prosecution on the one hand, and of the defense on the other. And, as I said before, it will give you two completely different stories told by the two men.â
âAnd the jury believed Neeleyâs story.â It was less a question on Rossâs part than a statement.
âIâm not so sure,â Steve said. âWhat I mean is that I think if Iâd been on that jury, I would have had to find the boy guilty no matter whose story I believed. Itâs a question of credibility. I know that old Mr. Hogan was blamed for poor defense by a lot of people after the trial, but they must have been people who got their information from the newspapers, people who didnât really follow the trial at firsthand very closely. On the weight of the evidence â¦â His voice trailed off.
âWell,â Ross said in a reasonable tone of voice, âletâs assume weâre the jury here in this room. Let us hear the two versions.â
âRight,â Steve said. âWell, first, hereâs the Dupaul version. Actually, of course, Neeley testified first, since he was a prosecution witness, but Iâll give it to you in this order.
âIn this Mountain Top Bar, Dupaul said he sat down at the bar and found himself sitting next to a woman. He said she was pretty old; his exact words were âmiddle-aged, in the neighborhood of thirty or thirty-fiveâ but remember, at the time he had just turned nineteen. He said she was very good-looking and very sexy. He said they got talking and she told him her name was Mrs. Neeley, but he could call
Angel Payne, Victoria Blue