in the space above the crowd, a place where few in
the audience ever look, but precisely where a speaker’s eyes naturally
want to go. In a good room, the ceiling is free of distractions; in a bad
room, there’s a large glowing ball of stupidity hanging there.
Figure 4-1. At a big event with stage lights. This gives an idea of what I
see: mostly nothing.
Disco balls work because they’re undeniably silly and make fun of
real attempts at decoration, butchandeliers, even the cheap ones I often see, are entirely
serious. Despite their phony plastic flame-shaped light bulbs (who was
ever fooled by these?), they are a lame attempt to give a room class, a
kind of class that—to the disappointment of the owners of these
rooms—cannot be obtained by hanging something large and shiny from the
ceiling. I’m told these chandeliers are placed in conference halls for one
reason: weddings. They want to rent the room out for weddings—the highest
marked-up events in the Western world—and somehow without an ugly
chandelier in the brochure, they fear they’ll never be chosen as a wedding
venue again. Next time you’re at a lecture, check the ceiling. If you spot
a chandelier, know that it’s not there for you.
Why pick on a glorified light fixture? Why risk beingbanned from speaking at chandelier-industry conferences for
the rest of my life? Here’s why. Presenters talk about “tough rooms” all
the time, usually referring to the audience. They blame the crowd when
they should first blame the room . Many challenges are created by
the room itself, challenges of atmosphere that change lukewarm crowds into
tough ones. Ever try to throw a birthday party in a graveyard or a funeral
in an amusement park? Of course not. You’d be set up to fail—unless your
family has handfuls of Xanex for breakfast or you’re related to Tim
Burton. Most venues for speaking and lecturing in the modern world are
dull, grey, uninspiring, poorly lit, generic cubes of space. They are
designed to be boring (which is why it’s hard to stay awake during
lectures) so they can be used for anything. And like a Swiss Army knife,
this means they suck at everything. Your average conference room or
corporate lecture hall is bought and sold for its ability to serve many
different purposes, though none of them well, which explains my unnatural,
and possibly deadly, level of exposure tochandeliers. Blame speakers all you want—we do deserve most
of the blame—but some fraction of hate should go to whoever chose the
crappy room to stick the audience in. It’s not my choice. If I had my
choice, here’s where you’d see me (check out Figure 4-2 ).
Figure 4-2. The Greek Theater at Epidaurus.
I’d want to be at this Greek amphitheater, in part, because I hear
it’s quite nice in Greece, but mostly because theideal room for a lecture is a theater. It’s crazy, I know,
but we solved most lecture-room problems about 2,000 years ago. The Greek
amphitheater gets it all just about right, provided it doesn’t rain.
Lecture rooms should be a semicircle, not a square. The stage should be a
few feet higher than the front row, both to make people on the stage
easier to see, but also to help them feel powerful. And most
importantly, every row of seats should be higher off the ground than the
one before it, giving everyone a clear line of sight. All of these things
make it easier for the audience to stay interested and focus its attention
on center stage, as well as provide the speaker with natural
acoustics.
One of the best lectures I’ve given in recent memory was at Carnegie
Mellon University in the Adamson Wing, a theater-sized room that seats
maybe 120 (see Figure 4-3 ). [ 22 ] If you put a kegerator inside the lectern and added a
remote-controlled shock system that would electrify individual seats on
command (an anti-heckler device), it would be perfect.
Figure 4-3. The Adamson Wing at Carnegie Mellon