Dogma by Lars Iyer Read Free Book Online Page A

that our thoughts are too small. That we’re unable to think the magnitude of what needs to be thought: its vastness, its ominousness, like the black, heavy clouds that precede a hurricane.
    W. dreams of a thought that would move with what it thinks, follow and respond to it, like a surfer his wave. A thought that would inhabit what was to be thought, like a fish the sea—no, a thought that would be only a drop of the sea in the sea, belonging to its object as water does to water.
    The thought of God would be made of God, the thought of tears would be wet with tears … And the thought of disaster?

 
    W. remembers the story I told him about the Hindu doctrine of the Four Ages.
    In the Age of Gold , I told him, everyone was content; there were no differences between human beings—no high born or low born; and there was no hatred, no violence. Everyone lived for a hundred years. Heaven and earth were one. No priests were necessary, for the meaning of holy scripture was clear. All souls lived in truth.
    In the Age of Silver , W. remembers, unhappiness appeared, along with weariness and nostalgia. Rain fell; it was necessary to take shelter in the trees. And lifespans dropped by a quarter. Morality began to atrophy; heaven and earth came asunder. But the scriptures were studied, although the priests no longer understood all they read, and squabbled over their interpretations.
    In the Age of Bronze , W. remembers, fear appeared, predation. People sheltered in the cities that had sprung up on the plains. Lifespans fell by a further quarter. Lies became common. Virtue guttered like a candle flame in the draft. Heaven and earth broke apart. Priests could make out only a few words of the ancient tongue of the scriptures, and theworld no longer asked them for their interpretation of the divine word.
    In the Age of Iron , our age, there is the dominion of power and war: that’s what I told W. Honesty and generosity reside only with the poor, who flee from the cities and hide in the valleys. The rule of virtue gives way to the rule of money. Drought lies upon the land, ashes fill the sky. In our age, I told W., the descendants of priests throw aside the scriptures. What do they understand of the ancient tongue? And what relevance has holy scripture to an age without hope?
    But I neglected to tell him about the Age of Shit . I didn’t tell him about the shape of the age to come, which is becoming clearer and clearer to him. War will be all, devouring all, W. says. Human beings will be like rats, like vermin. And the skies will burn, W. says. He can see them burning.
    That’s when I will come into my own, the last of the great lineage of Brahmin priests, W. says. That’s when I will wear my great grin, as the living abortion of that line, its desecration. That’s when I’ll perform my cosmic dance, like a strutting, overfed chicken …
    And then? What comes next? The great flood, W. says. Water and darkness. And then, after many thousands of years, the last avatar of Vishnu—what was his name? Kalkin, I remind him. Kalkin will appear, ready to restore the world, W. says. He’ll ride a white horse and wield a fiery sword. And he’ll perform the sacrifice that destroys the world and lets a new one rise up in its place. And so the whole cycle will begin again.
    The Hindu always thinks in cycles, W. says.—‘You’re a cyclical people’. This is where he is furthest from the Hindu, he says. He, as a Jew and a Catholic, is essentially linear . The meaning of the end times—our end times—is entirely different for him, W. says.
    What does the apocalypse mean for the Hindu?, W. wonders. Not judgement, and not redemption. For the Hindu, with his endless cycles, the apocalypse can be only the prelude to a new beginning.
    Can the Hindu really— really —understand the horror of the apocalypse?, W. wonders. Can he really— really —understand the glory of redemption?’
    It’s what he’s long suspected, W. says. We both see