even that some quirk of Kpelle biology prevented them from achieving intellectual sophistication. However, the story isthat, frustrated, one of the researchers told them to do the test âlike a fool would,â and they immediately produced the âcorrectâ answers.
Given the language and cultural barriers, the tests involved sorting items into groups. The researchers decided that sorting items into categories (tools, animals, items made of stone, wood, and so on), something that required abstract thinking and processing, was more intelligent. But the Kpelle always sorted things into function (things I can eat, things I can wear, things I can dig with). This was deemed âlessâ intelligent, but clearly the Kpelle disagreed. These are people who live off the land, so sorting things into arbitrary categories would be a meaningless and wasteful activity, something a âfoolâ would do. As well as being an important lesson in not judging people by your own preconceptions (and maybe about doing better groundwork before beginning an experiment), this example shows how the very concept of intelligence is seriously affected by the environment and preconceptions of society.
A less-drastic example of this is known as the Pygmalion effect. In 1965, Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson did a study where teachers in elementary schools were told that certain pupils were advanced or intellectually gifted, and should be taught and monitored accordingly. 16 As youâd expect, these pupils showed tests and academic performance in line with being of higher intelligence. The trouble was, they werenât gifted; they were normal pupils. But being treated as if they were smarter and brighter meant they essentially started performing to meet expectations. Similar studies using college students have shown similar results; when students are told that intelligence is fixed, they tend to perform worse on tests. If told that itâs variable, they perform better.
Maybe this is another reason why taller people seem more intelligent overall? If you grow taller at a young age, people may treat you as if youâre older, so engage you in more mature conversation, so your still-developing brain conforms to these expectations. But in any case, clearly self-belief is important. So any time Iâve mentioned that intelligence is âfixedâ in this book, Iâve essentially been hampering your development. Sorry, my bad.
Another interesting/weird thing about intelligence? Itâs increasing worldwide, and we donât know why. This is called the Flynn effect, and it describes the fact that general scores of intelligence, both fluid and crystallized, are increasing in a wide variety of populations around the world with every generation, in many countries, and despite the varying circumstances that are found in each one. This may be due to improved education worldwide, better healthcare and health awareness, greater access to information and complex technologies, or maybe even the awakening of dormant mutant powers that will slowly turn the human race into a society of geniuses.
Thereâs no evidence to suggest that last one is occurring, but it would make a good film.
There are many possible explanations as to why height and intelligence are linked. They all may be right, or none of them may be right. The truth, as ever, probably lies somewhere between these extremes. Itâs essentially another example of the classic nature v. nurture argument.
Is it surprising that it would be so uncertain, given what we know about intelligence? Itâs hard to define, measure and isolate but itâs definitely there and we can study it. It is a specific general ability made up of several others. There arenumerous brain regions used to produce intelligence, but it may be the manner in which these are connected that makes all the difference. Intelligence is no guarantee of confidence and lack of it is no guarantee