because he hasnât forgotten about his charactersâ toenails and kidneys even as heâs writing about their immortal souls. (Thatâs just an over-excited figure of speech, by the way, that bit about toenails and kidneys. There are no toenails in Tinkers , that I remember. I donât want to put anyone off.) Harding was at the Iowa Writersâ Workshop, and I donât know whether he was taught by Marilynne Robinson, but if he was, then I would have loved to sit in on their tutorials; Tinkers , in its depth, wisdom, sadness, and lightly worn mysticism, is reminiscent of Robinsonâs Housekeeping . (And Iâm not suggesting for a moment he ripped her off, because you canât rip Marilynne Robinson off, unless you too are wise and deep and possessed of a singular and inimitable consciousness.)
Tinkers is about a dying man called George Crosby; heâs an old man, coming to the end of his natural life, and heâs hallucinating and remembering, failing to prevent the past from leaking into the present. And Georgeâs dying is linked to his father, Howardâs, life, and eventual death. Howard sold household goods off the back of a wagon toward the beginning of the last centuryâhe was a tinker. George repaired clocks. Itâs breathtakingly ambitious in its simplicity, but Harding is somehow able, in this novel that runs less thantwo hundred pages, to include the moments on which a life turns, properly imagined moments, moments grounded in the convincing reality of the characters. I was going to say that itâs perhaps not the best book to take on holiday, because who wants to be reminded of his own mortality while he watches his children frolicking in the icy British surf? But then again, who wants to be reminded of his own mortality after heâs wasted a day messing around on the internet instead of writing a very small section of a superfluous novel, or a screenplay that probably wonât get turned into a film? On reflection, the holiday option is probably the better one: when my time comes, I hope that my children frolic before my eyes. I certainly donât want to see an unedited paragraph of a superfluous novel.
NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2010
BOOKS BOUGHT:
Book of Days âEmily Fox Gordon
The Master âColm TóibÃn
Nothing to Envy : Ordinary Lives in North Korea âBarbara Demick
Family Britain, 1951â1957 âDavid Kynaston
The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger âRichard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett
BOOKS READ:
How to Live: Or, a Life of Montaigne in One Question and Twenty Attempts at an Answer âSarah Bakewell
The Broken Word âAdam Foulds
Book of Days âEmily Fox Gordon
S omething has been happening to me recentlyâsomething which, I suspect, is likely to affect a significant and important part of the rest of my life. The grandiose way of describing this shift is to say that I have been slowly making my peace with antiquity; or, to express it in words that more accurately describe whatâs going on, I have discovered that some old shit isnât so bad.
Hitherto, my cultural blind spots have included the Romantic poets, every single bar of classical music ever written, and just about anything produced before the nineteenth century, with the exception of Shakespeare and a couple of the bloodier, and hence more Tarantinoesque, revenge tragedies. When I was young, I didnât wantto listen to or read anything that reminded me of the brown and deeply depressing furniture in my grandmotherâs house. She didnât have many books, but those she did own were indeed brown: cheap and old editions of a couple of Sir Walter Scottâs novels, for example, and maybe a couple of hand-me-down books by somebody like Frances Hodgson Burnett. When I ran out of stuff to read during the holidays, I was pointed in the direction of her one bookcase, but I wanted bright Puffin paperbacks, not mildewed old