injected.â
âYes.â
âAnd there are no problems with that?â
âNo, not at all,â Daniel said. âThereâs already been considerable experience using this technique on humans for other therapies. The injection must be done carefully, under controlled conditions, but thereâs generally no problem whatsoever. In our experience, the mice have had no ill effects.â
âAre the mice cured soon after the injection?â
âIn our experience, the Parkinsonâs symptoms begin to subside immediately,â Daniel said. âAnd it continues rapidly. With the mice weâve treated, itâs been truly remarkable. Within a week, the treated mice cannot be distinguished from the well controls.â
âI suppose you are eager to try this on humans,â Ashley suggested.
âExtremely so,â Daniel admitted with a series of nods for emphasis. âAfter we complete our animal studies, which are moving ahead rapidly, weâre hoping for a fast track with the FDA to begin human trials in a controlled setting.â
Ashley saw Daniel glance at his companion and even grip her hand for a moment. Ashley smiled inwardly, sensing Daniel was thinking the hearing was going well. It was time to rectify that misconception. âTell me, Doctor Lowell,â Ashley began. âHave you ever heard the saying: If something sounds too good to be true, it probably isnât ?â
âOf course.â
âWell, I think HTSR is a prime example. Putting aside for a moment the semantic argument about whether or not embryos are being dismembered, HTSR has another major ethical problem.â
Ashley paused for effect. The audience was completely still.
âDoctor,â Ashley said patronizingly. âHave you ever read that classic novel by Mary Shelley called Frankenstein ?â
âHTSR has nothing to do with the Frankenstein myth,â Daniel said indignantly, implying he knew full well where Ashley was headed. âTo imply as much is an irresponsible attempt to take advantage of public fears and misconceptions.â
âI beg to disagree,â Ashley said. âIn fact, I think Mary Shelley must have had an inkling that HTSR was coming down the pike, and thatâs why she wrote her novel.â
The spectators again laughed. It was apparent they were hanging on to every word and enjoying themselves.
âNow I know I have not had the benefit of an Ivy League education, but I read Frankenstein, whose whole title includes The Modern Prometheus, and I think the parallels are remarkable. As I understand it, the word transgenic, which is part of the confusing name of your procedure, means taking bits and pieces of various peopleâs genomes and mixing them together like youâre making a cake. That sounds to this country boy pretty much the same thing Victor Frankenstein did when he made his monster, getting pieces from this corpse and parts from another and sewing them up together. He even used a bit of electricity, just like you people do with your cloning.â
âWith HTSR, we are adding relatively short lengths of DNA, not whole organs,â Daniel retorted heatedly.
âCalm down, Doctor!â Ashley said. âThis is a fact-finding hearing weâre having here, not a fight. What Iâm driving at is that, with your procedure, youâre taking parts of one person and putting them in another. Isnât that true?â
âOn a molecular level.â
âI donât care what level it is,â Ashley said. âI just want to establish the facts.â
âMedical science has been transplanting organs for some time,â Daniel snapped. âThe general public does not see amoral problem with that, quite the contrary, and organ transplantation is certainly a better conceptual parallel with HTSR than Mary Shelleyâs nineteenth-century novel.â
âIn the example you gave concerning Parkinsonâs