âKid Charlemagneâ and the death of the sixties remains unclear, and in the silence between that track and the next, itâs the guitar youâre left with, like a single, wonderful flavour that has completely and regrettably overpowered a delicate recipe. Joy is never an unwelcome guest, but some songs are happier to see it than others: Springsteenâsguitar solo in âThundercrackâ (from Tracks ) comes tumbling ecstatically out of a deliberately discordant screech and, though Springsteenâs not the cleverest guitarist in the world (and the song isnât really a song at all, simply a tumultuous way to finish a stage show), he can do that kind of West Side Story street-punk energized ecstasy standing on his head, and it always makes me happy to hear it.
But my favourite solos are the ones that somehow show that the soloist has felt the song, words, music and all, felt the song and understood its very being, so that the solo becomes not only an imaginative reinterpretation of it, but also a contribution to and articulation of its meaning and its essence, like a piece of brilliant practical criticism. And sure, this is what solos are supposed to do, but most of them are at best an imaginative reinterpretation of the melody line; very few of them give the impression that they want to engage with the songwriterâs soul. David Lindley did this spectacularly on the first few Jackson Browne albums; Clapton did it repeatedly on Layla , when he was apparently strung out on heroin and exalted by grief â a blow for those of us who donât want to buy into either of these myths about art. His solo on âNobody Knows You When Youâre Down & Outâ, a deeply felt, simply played break that seems to pour unstoppably from a deep woundin the centre of the song itself â not the guitarist, but the song â is my favourite white blues-rock moment. Clarence Clemons isnât my favourite soloist â weâve heard the same solo too many times â but if I were Bruce I would have wept at what Clemons produced for âLovers In The Coldâ (a Born To Run out-take that you can find on the Net), because I would have felt well and truly understood, and every single swoop and squall is an articulation of devotion to the spirit of the song and of its creator. And the delirious violin solo in the middle of Mary Margaret OâHaraâs extraordinary âBodyâs In Troubleâ hiccups and swoons as if itâs on the verge of the kind of fainting fit that young nineteenth-century English women were supposed to have experienced in Florence: you donât get too many attacks of aesthetic ecstasy on your average pop-folk album, but this one nearly overwhelms the song.
The thing I love about these solos is that they can crop up in unexpected places, and they neednât even be particularly well played. Paul Westerberg, everyoneâs favourite coulda-beena-contender, is no pianist, but his solo on âBorn for Meâ is just lovely â maybe because heâs the singer-songwriter, and knows what his song feels like to him, and therefore what it should feel like to us. âBorn for Meâ is a ragged ballad, with a Waitsian lonely losersâ lyricand an affectingly heartsick tune; the solo is basically played with one finger, and initially at least consists of three notes, but it sounds great to me â not in a punky, do-it-yourself way (although frankly you could, once youâve heard it), but in a strangely, intensely musical way. A better pianist would have wrecked the moment, filled in the gaps, failed to recognize how the tune has exerted a spell over the right listener; somebody with little talent and absolutely no ear would simply have chosen the wrong three notes. Just as you know intuitively when the simplest and crudest brushstrokes have been made by a proper artist, I can never listen to the solo without thinking that itâs played by a