motive, or a witness to the crime and its planning, the stateâs chances of winning a conviction on murder in the first will depend entirely on circumstantial evidence. Thereâs no shortage of that, of course, and much of it is compelling: the security tape seems to show Hernandez with the black .45 the night of the crime; the videotapes that track his carâs movements, from the time he picked up Lloyd at his house in Boston to the second they entered the industrial park before the shooting; the shell casing recovered from the rental car that matched the ones found beside Lloyd.
To undercut the damning evidence, Hernandez may have to take the stand and provide an explanation, says Gerry Leone, the former district attorney of Middlesex County, Massachusetts, who convicted Richard Reid, the shoe bomber, among other high-profile cases. âYou put him on if your defense case hinges on something that can only come from himââfor instance, the claim that he always carried a gun when leaving the house, protection from the gangsters who wanted him dead, and that it was Ortiz, not Hernandez, who pulled the trigger after a botched attempt to scare Lloyd. âIf he says he was shocked by the shooting and only agreed to scare him, that might get him off,â says renowned Boston attorney Anthony Cardinale, who repped John Gotti and other mobsters and has taught at Harvard Law School. âItâs not a crime to be there if you had no reason to expect that someone would be shot.â
A bigger problem for the prosecution is the all-or-nothing charge theyâve levied against Hernandez. In deciding to try him for murder in the first, theyâll be asking jurors to send a young man to prison for the rest of his life, no parole. âIn these cases, juries think that reasonable doubt means no doubt at all,â says Cardinale. âIf the defense can create even the slightest crack, he may walk like George Zimmerman walkedâprobably guilty, but the DA overcharged.â
So call him stupid or sloppy or a menace to society, Hernandez keeps catching the breaks. Heâs gotten rich running to daylight after being hemmed in, shedding tacklers and accusers to escape. If he eludes pursuit again, there will be blame to go around, but no one can claim they didnât see it coming. Heâs been getting away with murder, figuratively, if not literally, his whole life.
DAVID MERRILL
The One-Legged Wrestler Who Conquered His Sport, Then Left It Behind
FROM DEADSPIN.COM
Â
T HE FIRST MATCH of the last tournament of Anthony Roblesâs wrestling career began with his dropping to the mat in a tripodâtwo hands and a knee. There was no other limb to use; Robles had been born without a right leg, and now the bottom of his maroon-and-gold Arizona State University singlet hung shriveled and slack on that side. His opponent in the 125-pound weight class, a Virginia sophomore named Matt Snyder, loomed over him, twice his height, even in a wrestlerâs crouch.
It was March 2011, and Robles was in Philadelphia for the NCAA Division I championships, college wrestlingâs preeminent tournament. As a sophomore, he had finished an auspicious fourth; the next year, he had slipped to seventh. Now, as a senior, he was the top seedâa first for a one-legged wrestler. His remarkable achievement had drawn a throng of reporters to the pre-tournament press conference, where, to widespread bewilderment, Robles had announced that he would retire from wrestling at the end of the championships. He would not compete internationally. He would not try out for the London Olympics. He would become a motivational speaker, he had told the baffled reporters and fans before him, and turn his back on wrestling at the moment he had come to dominate it.
Snyder circled. Robles pawed his opponentâs head, then shot forward, viperlike, at Snyderâs legs. There was no time to sprawl away. In an instant, Robles took