churchesââ
Impolite to call them Protestant , here.
ââAnd I remember listening to them sing of the all-seeing, all-punishing Deity, and thinking they sounded the way mice would sound, if mice worshipped a cat.â
Ferdinandâs eyebrows shot up, his bland expression surprised into keen intelligence. âRather an Old Testament view⦠So youâve been exposed to heresies as well as the true Faith. Your opinion of the Holy Father and the Church isâ?â
Conrad closed one fist around the chain-links, tight enough to leave marks.
Tullio always tells me I donât have the brains for a convincing lie .
âI donât deny the Churchâs miracles, sir. Or rather, I donât deny that, by the singing of Mass, the sick are healed, daily, and ghosts are laid to rest, and the walking dead appeased. Iâve seen this.â
âBut?â
âButâ!â Conrad gestured, and restrained himself at the sound of clinking metal. âI do deny that this has anything to do with a Deity! Nothing about it demands a god in explanation. Why arenât these things regarded as a part of the natural world which we donât yet understand?â
Ferdinandâs pace slowed. He clasped his hands behind him as he walked. His bright gaze appraised Conrad. âThe natural world? Do you hold with Dr Schellingâs ideas of Naturphilosophie , thenâthat all of nature is a single organism, aspiring upwards to a more spiritual stage, no matter how low it may be? A speck of dust, a weed, a reptile; all aspire to rise and become part of the single great World-Spirit?â
Conrad couldnât help an impolite snort. âI rather think thatâs religion under another name! Wasnât Schelling a poet as well as a professor of philosophy, sir? Poets often have a difficult time telling science from mysticism.â
Conrad could have sworn the King of the Two Sicilies momentarily looked highly amused.
âAnd this from a man who writes poetry for a living!â
âI donât write poetry, sir. I write librettos.â
âAnd the difference?â
âThe English poet Mister Lord Byron doesnât have to take his poem back during rehearsals and turn one stanza into one lineâor one line into six lines on a different subject altogether.â
âAhâ¦â
Man-sized Roman amphorae stood against the palace wall. Vines grew up from urns, curling around the stanchions that held the awning. The sun cast coiling shadows on the flagstones, at which the King tilted his head, appearing thoughtful.
âNo God, only material nature. That sounds very much like âdenying the Churchâs miracles.ââ
âSir, the Church claims miracles are caused by a deity rewarding and punishing us according to the condition of our immortal souls⦠But even a glance shows virtue often isnât rewarded, and sin isnât punished. Besides, I met during the war a Monsieur Xavier Bichat, a physician, who developed an analysis of human tissue types. He found no âsoulâ there, no matter how deeply he dug.â
Conrad glanced away off the terrace, at where the bare masts of merchant ships rocked rhythmically; crews rowing between them and the shore. One warshipâan English frigate, from the flagsâcut white water at her prow, running down towards Sorrento. Flocks of bum-boats, lateen-sailed feluccas and dhows, and fishing boats (all equally full of traders) disconsolately tacked back towards the harbour.
âBichat theorised there might be some vital Galvanic force of life that arises purely from our material bodiesâa vital force which may be capable of thingswe donât yet understandâa force which produces our conscious souls. Yes, Iâve attended Madame Lavoisierâs salon , and heard other natural philosophers claim M. Bichat is wrong! But they wonât go to Church doctrine when they seek to disprove