were more than 700 documents on Nexis referring to the âRepublican Attack Machine.â For that same period, Nexis produces only 16 documents using either the phrase âDemocratic Attack Machineâ or âDemocrat Attack Machine.â
What liberals mean when they complain about âattacksâ is simply that it is unfair to point out the things the Democrats believe. Republicans telling the truth about them is dirty pool.
There they go, calling our name again!
Naturally, the Republicansâ damnable habit of talking candidly about the Democrats is enraging to people who are constantlyworking on perfecting their fake-American costumes. They believe it is unsporting for Republicans not to blindly accept their lofty rhetoric about âhopeâ and âchange.â
The rare appearance of the phrase âDemocratic Attack Machineâ in the media mostly comes from conservative columnists pointing out:
Hey, there's a Democratic Attack Machine too!
That is absurd. There is only one attack machine and that is the mainstream media. The media don't recognize what they're doing as attacks because their beliefs are axiomatic, the default position, what all âknowledgeable and fair-minded peopleâ 1 believe.
Both the Republican and Democratic Parties are penny-ante compared with the liberal media behemoth, which has been utterly unmoved by the smashing success of fair and balanced Fox News Channel. Mass mailings and ârobo-callsâ by political parties are like mosquitoes buzzing around the King Kong of the mass media as it stomps on cars and buses and terrifies Japanese extras. The only difference between the attack machines of the political parties is that the media will pick up and repeat the attacks produced by the Democrats but will vilify any attacks launched by Republicans.
Indeed, the media and the Democratic Party synchronize their work so closely, it's often impossible to tell them apart. Who's to say where a Clinton flack ends and
This Week with George Stephanopoulos
begins? But as Bill and Hillary Clinton found out during the 2008 Democratic primaries, it's the media that call the shots for the Left in America, not the Democrats. Without the mainstream media 100 percent behind the Clintons, suddenly Bill wasn't so sexy and Hillary wasn't so smart.
Liberals have nothing but admiration for criminal defense lawyers who lie remorselessly on behalf of child murderers, self-righteously informing us that this is âpart of the process.â Without these âTwinkie defenseâ champions, liberals tell us, our adversarial system of justice would collapse. They boast âsomeone's got to do it,â as if they were Marines going into battle. (For any liberals reading, a U.S. Marine is ⦠oh, never mind. It would take too long to explain.) But an adversarial system in politics drives liberals to distraction. It's one thing to vigorously defend a child molester, another thing entirely to vigorously defenda Republican. Giving two sides of the story in a child kidnapping case is part of the process; giving two sides of the story in a political race is a dirty trick of the Republican Attack Machine.
IN LIBERALSâ IMAGINARY WORLD, LONE BLOGGER MICHAEL Brodkorb is more powerful than the
New York Times,
the
Washington Post,
the
Minneapolis Star Tribune,
the
St. Paul Pioneer Press,
and the entire liberal blogosphere. As a hobby, Brodkorb started a blog called âMinnesota Democrats Exposed.â In short order, he was uncovering stories the mainstream media somehow missed. In 2008, Brodkorb discovered that Democratic Senate candidate Al Franken owed about $70,000 in back taxes and had a $25,000 judgment against his corporation in New York for unpaid workersâ compensation insurance. Franken's spokesman responded to these allegations by denouncing Brodkorb as âthe right-wing noise machine.â
In an Associated Press article about Brodkorb's repeatedly