historians, notably
Jim Bradbury ( The Medieval Archer
Boydell & Brewer: Woodbridge,
1985), have claimed that this
would have been a most unusual
deployment for the era, and
would have weakened the line of
men-at-arms considerably. Instead
they suggest that the archers were
deployed on the flanks, behind their line of stakes, enabling them to provide The battlefield at
a flanking fire on the French forces while at the same time leaving the line of Agincourt is well
men-at-arms unbroken.
commemorated by a
For the French there survives a battle plan devised to deal with the English museum in the village threat; although it was only applicable to the smaller advanced force under itself and memorials
the command of Marshal Boucicaut and Constable d'Albret it does highlight and a Calvary on the field.
many of the tactics used by the French in the actual battle itself. They intended These models of archers to use two divisions of mounted troops to the flanks and rear of the army to line the road from
encircle and neutralize the English archers, and to attack the baggage train and Agincourt to Tramecourt, rear of the English army, while the main body of men-at-arms was to advance which runs just in front in the centre, protected to the flanks by crossbowmen and other missile troops of where the French front that were available.
line would have been.
The actual formation adopted by the French on the day of the battle is (Author's collection)
strikingly similar, with the three central battles of men-at-arms lined up one
in front of each other. The first two consisted of dismounted men-at-arms
while the third was mounted. Two further units of mounted troops were
mounted on the flanks, while French crossbowmen and other missile troops
appear to have played little part in the battle. While the basic formation of the
French forces appears to be clear, the numbers involved are to a large extent
uncertain. The French certainly outnumbered the English, but to what extent
is debatable. A recent study by Anne Curry ( Agincourt: A New History Tempus:
Stroud, 2006) argues that the numbers involved are much closer than previous
historians have claimed, and that the French forces may have only totalled
12,000 compared to an English figure of 9,000. The various English and
French chronicles give any figure from 8,000 to 150,000, with the total of
60,000 occurring frequently. The Burgundian chronicler Enguerran Monstrelet
breaks down the French army in some detail, with 13,500 men in the first
battle, a similar number in the main battle and the rest in the third, excepting
two forces of 800 and 1,600 cavalry on the flanks, giving a grand total for the
French of between 35,000 and 40,000. While the numbers may be uncertain,
what is clear is that the English forces had a preponderance of archers
29
The battle of Agincourt, 25 October 1415
French Camp .
w W f> W.^v
kiS&fjfc&XffiiS
m&mkm
. English Camp
English Forces
1. Dismounted men-at-arms under King Henry
2. Dismounted men-at-arms under Thomas Lord Camoys
Maisoncelle ^ ^
3. Dismounted men-at-arms under the Duke of York
4. Archers on the flanks
French Forces
A. Dismounted men-at-arms under Charles d'Albret
B. Cavalry commanded by the Count of Vendome
C. Cavalry commanded by Clignet de Brebant
D. Second line of dismounted men-at-arms along with archers
and crossbowmen, commanded by the Dukes of Bar and Alengon
E. French calvary
as opposed to men-at-arms, while the French forces were much more
traditionally based upon the heavily armoured men-at-arms as the centre
point of their fighting force.
The French system of command and control was by no means as clear cut
as that of the English, with the advance guard commanded by Constable
d'Albret and Marshal Boucicaut along with the Dukes of Orleans and Bourbon,
as well as the Counts of Eu and Richemont. The main body was under the
Dukes of Bar and Alengon and the Counts of Nevers, Vaudemont,
Robert & Lustbader Ludlum