in political science from Harvard, masterâs degree from the University of Chicago. He was one of the few people unafraid to stand toe-to-toe with Sara in an argument. They had few real professional disputes, however, and no issues stemming from their nominal ethnic and religious affiliations. The only knock-down-drag-outs in the office were over American politics. Sara was a hard-core Republican and Shoe a card-carrying Democrat. Ken, thankfully, was a libertarian who was often called on to moderate.
âMullah Akhbar just installed himself in the presidential palace over the weekend as an âadvisorâ to Talwar. Thatâs just the latest sign that the influence of the clerics is on the rise. It looks like Barazani is on the way out at the Defense Ministry. He lost an arm-wrestling match with Yusaf Khel, who is close to the clerics. The headlines in the papers over the weekend were all about Kashmir and pretty inflammatory.â
âWhatâs Talwarâs role in all this?â Sam asked. âIs he even trying to hold the line against the clerics?â
âTrying and failing,â Shoe replied. âThe Islamists are definitely on the ascent, helped out, mind you, by public anger at our drone-strikes program in the northwest tribal belt.â
âWhat about recent developments in the Pakistani military?â Sam asked, turning to Ken. âAnything I should be ready to brief upstairs on?â
âThere are a lot of variables,â Ken cautioned. âWhatever you tell the boss, Iâd hedge the bets a bit. Indications are that the religious leadership is extending its reach, particularly with the army. Weâve seen a rotation of senior colonelsâbrigade commandersâthat has marginalized the most secular and put more overtly religious officers in charge of critical units.â
âDoes that include nuclear units?â
âIt does. They donât have direct control of the weapons themselves. Those units are, for the time being, reporting directly to Talwar, but the units that control the installations where the weapons are based are increasingly subject to clerical influence if not yet direct control. Itâs really only a matter of time, however.â
âYou all are just a bundle of sunshine this Monday morning, arenât you?â
Shoe leaned across the table. âThereâs one more thing,â he said in a conspiratorial whisper.
âWhat is it?â
âIâm worried about the intel-sharing program.â
âIn what way?â
âYou know we have a program to share select intel with the Indian and Pakistani services?â
âSure. In exchange for some of their reporting. Itâs a pretty standard arrangement.â
âWell, Iâm picking up echoes in our information. What we are giving the two sides is evidently volatile enough that itâs getting amplified and driving the debate within their own systems. Thereâs something of a positive feedback loop in operation. What they know about each other, or what they think they know about each other, affects what they do and the choices they make, which in turn influences what they think about each other. The program was supposed to promote transparency and information exchange in the service of peaceful dispute resolution, but itâs having the opposite effect. Itâs making the leadership increasingly paranoid and trigger-happy.â
âIâm seeing the same thing as Shoe is in Islamabad. Our intel is dominating the discussion and reinforcing the hardliners. The program needs to be scaled back in some way, because itâs starting to warp the decision-making process in ways we donât entirely understand.â
âIâll raise it upstairs,â Sam promised. âBut donât get your hopes up. Those programs are managed by the director of National Intelligence, not Argus.â
Dorothy stuck her head into the conference