the Corporation. 10 John Shakespeare took on a succession of onerous public offices, and overstretched himself in business to the point of breaking; perhaps his courtship of his fatherâs landlordâs daughter is of a piece with the temerity that made him acquire freehold property before he had a wife, and to indulge in wool-dealing on a large scale rather than concentrating on his gloving business.
The marriage manuals warned men against marrying a woman richer and better connected than themselves on the ground that thewife who had come down in the world would never rest easy but would be constantly comparing her present state with what might have been. The woman John Shakespeare chose for his wife was proud of her descent from one of the oldest Warwickshire families, the Ardens of Park Hall, but her pride seems misplaced, for no direct relationship with the Arden Hall family can be traced. Mary Shakespeare may have been something of a social climber, goading her husband to seek gentility rather than agreeing to work beside him at his chosen trade.
Whittawing and glove-making was a smelly, messy business. When glover William Hobday died in Stratford in December 1601, his inventory included:
Â
202 dozen of sheepâs leather in the pitsâ¦
[that is, softening in a solution of dung or urine]
19 of bucksâ leather in the pitsâ¦
16 calfskins in the pitsâ¦
ten doeskins in the hairâ¦
six horsehides ready dressedâ¦
two dozen of deerâs leather and 15 Irish skins
13 dozen of calvesâ leather ready dressed
104 dozen of sheepâs leather and 104 dozen of lambsâ leather ready dressed
five dozen and odd of sheepâs leather that is tanned
Half an hundred of sheepâs leather in the alum and eight dozen of lining with seventeen dogskins and other broken leather⦠11
Â
Suppose that Mary gradually weaned Shakespeare off the whittawing and glove-making business and encouraged him to deal in wool instead, neither of them was experienced enough in commerce to realise that the world was changing. The wool trade was gradually and rather patchily coming under government control; stern punishments would soon be meted out to traders who were found to have evaded government regulation.
The Holy Trinity parish register shows the baptism of a âJoan Shakespeare daughter to John Shakespeareâ on 15 September 1558. It also shows another âJoan the daughter of John Shakespeareâ who wasbaptised on 15 April 1569. The explanation usually given is that the older Joan must have died and her name been recycled for a later-born sister, as was not uncommon. But the burial of the older Joan does not appear in the register. Another explanation could be that there were two Joans born eleven years apart to two Johns, one of whom moved away. Further support for this view comes from the fact that the elder Joanâs christening on 15 September 1558 is followed by a gap of more than four years in births to anyone called John Shakespeare. Margaret Shakespeare, christened on 2 December 1562, may have been our John Shakespeareâs first-born child; she is followed by William in April 1564, Gilbert in October 1566, Joan in April 1569, Ann in September 1571, Richard in March 1574, and then a hiatus before Edmund in 1580. Six births in the first twelve years of marriage, with a seventh after six years, is a fairly typical reproductive career of the period, when lactation was the usual limiting factor, either because it depressed ovulation or because abstinence was practised while a mother was breast-feeding, or both. A longer interval, caused by the motherâs declining fertility, is more likely to appear between the second-last and the last child than between the first and the second. If our suspicions about the two Joans are correct, Shakespeareâs parents could have married at any time after Maryâs fatherâs death in November 1556 and before