responding for themselves. First the actress has lines to follow, then she has to get the audienceâs attention back on herself, away from the murdered Chinese or whatever the thing is. (309)
Given that everyone involved has been party to the murder of Peterson, Dickâs example is calculated. In effect, Nicole is told that her lover is dead, and that in order to retain her class position (perceived as a relationship with a mass audience) she must avoid response and pursue gesture. Significantly, Dick casts himself as the âmurdered Chineseâ: his choice of figure is complex, perhaps involving an ironic reflection on his status as disposable servant; it also makes cryptic allusion to his own ethnically stained emissions, while, for Rosemary, hinting that what went on in Parisian and Roman hotel rooms was little more than the hiring and firing of a foreign body. These layers remain peripheral to the main direction of his lesson which, as the culmination of his language of fabrication, reflects his conviction that the social arena has become a stage where audience demand is paramount. In such circumstances, âcharmâ and âgraceâ give way to mere lying, as the mass market requires of its market leaders only that they surprise and so, through provision of the ânewâ, continue to lead. Nicole obeys instructions: she turns directly to Barban and to brand name, going âall
out
of characterâ in order to retain the characteristics of a changing class. She leaves the beach feeling ânew and happyâ (310), and âknowing vaguely that Dick had planned for her to have [her freedom]â (311), she writes a letter propositioning her next husband.
Book III charts Dickâs sustained performance of decline, during which he declares himself no longer effective; no longer a centre, an author or indeed a responsible agent of action. All is lethargy, parody and scorn: witness the sustained metaphors of vampirism, Dickâs bouts of interior laughter (337) and his final act â âwith a papal cross he blessed the beach from the high terraceâ (337). Dick abdicates comprehensively from what he has made, from his familial and professional tasks and, more disturbingly, from what he has been made â a âwhole-souledâ (67), integral being.
Nor can he be put together again. Poised above contrary movements within the capital which provides his foundation, he quits the sites which his adoptive class prefers. In no particular order, and virtually all at once, he deserts the psychiatric armchair, the surrogate drawing-rooms, the phallus and even (projecting) the sound-stage. Dickâs dive is complete and outdistances the critics. Perhaps âthe old interior laughterâ prompted the selection of an aquaplane from which to parody his surname. To push the pun (maybe no further than Fitzgerald intended) Dick does not resurface: without fixed abode or declared destination, his movements after his return to America are quite literally mapped by Nicole, but they are not understood. Symptomatically, he rejects her offer of money and no longer âask[s] for the children to be sentâ (338), capital and the family being two of the mediations through which he made himself what he was and has chosen no longer to be.
The problem remains: if Dick decides to quit, and money, alcohol, general dissolution or Fitzgeraldâs autobiography cannot in any emphatic sense be âblamedâ, why does he quit? At no point in the novel is his decision directly addressed, an omission that should not produce charges of slack construction or inadequate characterization. The question raises the broader issue of Fitzgeraldâs narrative technique. Cause passes from persons into objects viewed as metaphors or, more properly, as plot miniatures and encapsulated narratives. Fitzgeraldâs nine-year struggle with the construction of
Tender is the Night
reflects his fear