honest and writing without self-censorship. Everyone self-censors, all the time.â
I shrugged. âAs I said, it felt liberating not to. Besides, I donât think Miranda Frost self-censors, or not very much. So the format of the interview made a certain amount of sense.â
âAnd what about the follow-up? Does it make sense to go on offering up your life for public scrutiny?â
âYou sound like Beck. Except he said that I was dramatizing my life.â
âHow do you feel about that?â
âI think heâs being a bit unfair. Iâm not dramatizing my life. Iâm writing about something dramatic that occurred in my life. Thereâs a difference.â
âA subtle difference, some would argue.â
âItâs a big difference! I mean, with the Miranda Frost interview, itâs mostly just transcription. Itâs objective journalism in its purest sense.â
âAnd the follow-up?â
âWell, no â thatâs a personal account. It has to be subjective; thatâs what makes it interesting. But that doesnât mean Iâm dramatizing. I mean, yes, there may be a dramatic element to the language and structure, but thatâs because I wanted to capture the feeling of the experience. I wanted to be emotionally truthful.â
Dr Barbara weighed this argument in several seconds of silence.
I obviously hadnât made myself entirely clear, so I tried again. âPut it this way: we all use one or two dramatic tricks when weâre talking about our lives. Say you were late for work â you missed the bus or got stuck in traffic or something. Itâs very difficult to tell that story straight, without emphasizing certain details: the frustration, the watch-checking, the idiot in front of you who was on his mobile and didnât realize that the lights had changed. You want to convey the experience as it felt at the time. Itâs normal, and itâs not dramatizing as such. Itâs just drawing out whatâs inherently dramatic in the situation.â
These were arguments Iâd already rehearsed for when Beck read the follow-up; I was making him wait, too. Yet based on this trial run, I thought my explanation could do with some fine-tuning. Dr Barbara still looked sceptical.
âIâll reserve judgement until Iâve read the article,â she said.
Outside, the sky was starting to darken. There had been only a little high cloud when Iâd entered Dr Barbaraâs office, fifty minutes ago, but now it was dim enough that she had to switch on both of the floor lamps. As she did, I thought idly about how the session had not quite met my expectations. True, I was used to Dr Barbara challenging my thinking, on most topics, but today there was something else. Iâd been left feeling defensive and a little misunderstood, as if my words werenât having the effect I intended for them. It was in this mindset that I decided to mention that my libido seemed to be coming back. I wanted to give her some unequivocal good news, proof that despite everything â despite the arguments with Beck and the anxiety dream and Simonâs corpse â I was feeling generally better. But even here, Dr Barbaraâs reaction was guarded.
âI think thatâs something else we need to keep an eye on,â she told me.
âItâs a good thing,â I assured her. âI mean, I actually want sex again. Iâm enjoying it â really enjoying it â for the first time in months. Iâve had three orgasms in the past fortnight. I think itâs a pretty clear sign that my moodâs improving.â
Dr Barbara frowned a bit as she settled herself back in her chair, but she didnât blush. It was impossible to make Dr Barbara blush, as Iâd discovered months ago. She knew, of course, that my sex drive was the first thing to go when I was getting depressed. Iâd told her that before Christmas; it was