Rohland N, Hofreiter M (2007) Comparison characterization of DNA from archaeological
and optimization of ancient DNA extraction.
bone. Proc Biol Sci 244:45–50
Biotechniques 42:343–352
2. Hagelberg E, Sykes B, Hedges R (1989) 9. Poinar HN (2002) The genetic secrets some Ancient bone DNA amplifi ed. Nature
fossils hold. Acc Chem Res 35:676–684
342:485
10. Vasan S, Zhang X, Kapurnitou A, Bernhagen J,
3. Hofreiter M, Serre D, Poinar HN, Kuch M,
Teichberg S, Basgen J, Wagle D, Shih D, Terlecky
Pääbo S (2001) Ancient DNA. Nat Rev Genet
I, Bucala R, Cerami A, Egan J, Uhlrich P (1996)
2:353–359
An agent cleaving glucose-derived protein cross—
4. Cooper A, Poinar HN (2000) Ancient DNA:
links in vitro and in vivo. Nature 382:275–278
do it right or not at all. Science 289:1139
11. Adler CJ, Haak W, Donlon D, Cooper A
5. Leonard JA, Shanks O, Hofreiter M, Kreuz E,
(2010) Survival and recovery of DNA from
Hodges L, Ream W, Wayne RK, Fleischer RC
ancient teeth and bones. J Archaeol Sci
(2007) Animal DNA in PCR reagents plagues
38(5):956–964
ancient DNA research. J Archaeol Sci 12. Gilbert MTP, Wilson AS, Bunce M, Hansen AJ, 34:1361–1366
Willerslev E, Shapiro B, Higham TFG, Richards
6. Rohland N, Hofreiter M (2007) Ancient DNA
MP, O’Connell TC, Tobin DJ, Janaway RC,
extraction from bones and teeth. Nat Protoc
Cooper A (2004) Ancient mitochondrial DNA
2:1756–1762
from hair. Curr Biol 14:R463–R464
7. Handt O, Höss M, Krings M, Pääbo S (1994)
13. Lindahl T (1993) Instability and decay of the
Ancient DNA: methodological challenges.
primary structure of DNA. Nature 362:
Experientia 50:524–527
709–715
sdfsdf
Chapter 3
DNA Extraction of Ancient Animal Hard Tissue
Samples via Adsorption to Silica Particles
Nadin Rohland
Abstract
A large number of subfossil and more recent skeletal remains, many of which are stored in museums and private collections, are potentially accessible for DNA sequence analysis. In order to extract the small amount of DNA preserved in these specimens, an effi cient DNA release and purifi cation method is required. In this chapter, I describe an effi cient and straightforward purifi cation and concentration method that uses DNA adsorption to a solid surface of silica particles. Comparative analysis of extraction methods has shown that this method works reliably for ancient as well as younger, museum-preserved specimens.
Key words: Ancient DNA , DNA extraction , Bones , Teeth , Museum-specimen , Silica , Column 1. Introduction
The most abundant faunal remains are partial skeletons. Bones and teeth are the hardest tissues of vertebrates and can persist for hundreds of thousands of years without fossilization if sediments or permafrost shield them from unstable environmental conditions.
When environmental conditions are unfavorable for microbial life that would otherwise metabolize the hard tissue, this can lead to the preservation of DNA molecules within these ancient skeletons.
Such conditions are common to permafrost regions, where large numbers of preserved faunal remains have been found. In more moderate climatic ecosystems, well-preserved skeletal remains can be found within sediment deposits in natural shelters such as caves.
Three major obstacles impede DNA analyses of ancient skeletal remains. First, the total amount of DNA preserved in very old bones and teeth is likely to be very small, and often the DNA fragments that do remain are highly damaged ( 1 ) . The same may be Beth Shapiro and Michael Hofreiter (eds.), Ancient DNA: Methods and Protocols , Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 840, DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9_3, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012
21
22
N. Rohland
true for modern specimens that have been treated with chemical preservatives to prepare them for long-term storage in museums.
Second, if DNA is preserved in ancient bones or teeth, it is often contaminated with DNA from bacteria, fungi, or other