been stolen; this was followed up by the Hoare piece, which in turn led to a story from one James Hewitt, to the effect that heâd been the recipient of silent phone calls, too. Then came material about Dianaâs affair with Hewitt, still not widely known about at the time.
All of this mattered, not just for the entertainment of the nation but because Piers was still so very young. There had been plenty of grumbling about a lack of experience when heâd first got the job and yet, from the moment he took up the post, heâd been all but setting the news agenda. Meanwhile, he was careful to praise his reporters. âThey are the ones who bring in the stories,â he told The Spectator. âThis isnât false modesty; the only credit I would take is having the balls to run the stories.â
Royal stories, especially those involving Diana, could be tricky to handle, too. Despite the publicâs voracious appetite for anything involving âShy Diâ (who came close to bringing the Monarchy down), they adored her and, while they would read scandalous stories about her, there was a line over which no paper nor editor should step. Alleging nuisance calls while maintaining a sympathetic aura wasnât that easy, and there was a big risk in becoming the firstpaper to reveal Dianaâs own extra-marital affairs but the News Of The World somehow managed to pull it off.
âOn the Hewitt-Diana story, I held a council of war with my three top executives,â recalled Piers. âI often do this because Iâm only twenty-nine years old and Iâm aware I have experienced journalists around, but I do have to make the final decision.â
Then there was the issue of the Monarchy itself. At the time, the Republican movement in Britain was not a strong one but sometimes newspapers running anti-Windsor stories, especially those owned by the Australian-born Republican Rupert Murdoch, were accused of base motives. Piers, however, was having none of it.
âI totally believe in the Monarchy as an institution,â he declared, âbut I donât agree with royals behaving like the rest of us. If weâre going to give them palaces to live in, then they should behave in a regal manner. Princess Dianaâs come out of it well⦠sheâs loved more than she ever was.
âMy ultimate defence of stories is that they are 100 per cent true. I donât make moral judgements. Sometimes my mother rings up and tells me to leave Diana alone. My grandmother will say, âThatâs a revolting load of rubbish you printed this morning,â but, when I press her further, she will admit she found it entertaining.â
And so did everyone else.
Piers didnât usually bring his age into anything and he sounded far more himself when defending the publication of the Bienvenida Buck/Sir Peter Harding story, describedby some people as a âsadâ case. Sir Peter had been forced to resign from his post and his estranged wife had been pictured looking distraught.
âI donât think heâs a sad case at all!â insisted Piers. âIâd do the same thing again tomorrow. He was the Chief of the Defence Staff, behaving in a way that was quite appallingly stupid for a man in his position and also compromising the job he was doing. All army officers had only recently been sent a memo saying that adultery would result in dismissal, yet, while the Gulf War was raging, he was wining and dining his mistress. It was hypocritical. Iâm no great moraliser but I think itâs wrong for people in positions of power to commit adultery if, by so doing, they leave themselves or their jobs exposed. And itâs wrong if theyâre preaching one thing and doing another.
âIâm not dictating to ordinary people but say a married woman sleeps with the village policeman, her husband finds out, thereâs a fight and someone tells the News Of The World then weâll