always rose to the occasion of spontaneity, this was one short slice of twentieth-century existence. Two geniuses colliding at the Chelsea Hotel in 1973.â
Fug Tuli Kupferberg maintained a more speculative assessment of the Smith-Ginsberg Chelsea encounter: âWhen two geniuses get together, youâve got to expect something great!â¦Is there music on it?â
A fair question, it was only after this particularly raw phase of his singing career that Ginsberg began working in more sophisticated musical environs, ones that departed from his raggedy voice plus harmonium expositions at the Chelsea.
Guitarist Steven Taylor worked with the Fugs, and he was also Ginsbergâs accompanist for years, even playing on Hammondâs First Blues sessions. Taylor reflected on Ginsbergâs âblueâ period of the early â70s. âBlues is a particular genre within a larger history of African American folk music,â said Taylor. âOne of Allenâs main inspirations was Leadbelly, who was on the radio when he was a kid. Leadbelly is generally considered to be a songster, not a bluesman. Blues could be part of his repertoire, but the songster is a larger tradition. Allen was more of a songster than a bluesmanâa historian in song, a singer of ballad narratives, and a singer of topical material.â
âBlues are a funny thing,â said Fug Ed Sanders. âThey are supposedto make you sad but they make you triumph, too. Allenâs diaries are strangely filled with the down mode. The poor guy was so publicly joyous and exalted, but in his private moments he was quite sad and dejected. He was drawn to the blues. He had been a fan of Ma Rainey and âCC Riderâ was the final music, the last tune he listened to before he died.â
And what of the implicit connectivity that Harry Smith brought to the sessions at the Chelsea Hotel? Does it serve the same creative function that Smith unleashed when he first traced the paths of interrelated folk and blues idioms with the Anthology of American Folk Music ?
John Feins studied under both Harry and Allen at the Naropa Institute in Boulder, Colorado. He thought that Smithâs efforts to document life and sound were informed by a deep empathy for humankind. âWhatâs great is that Harry wasnât an elitist, he recorded everybody,â said Feins. âHarry felt that every occasion of sound was a recordable event and it had not just artistic merit and meaning, but anthropological meaning. If a human being opened his mouth up for song, Harry treasured and honored it as an archivist and a scholar and an anthropologist. He captured it when he could.â
Just how does First Blues sound? Noted Ginsberg authority Bob Rosenthal is tough but fair. âIâll be frank with you. I couldnât listen to this record,â he said. âI just wrote it off as caterwauling. I was so skeptical when I heard someone was going to reissue this. Iâll confess Iâm much more interested in it now than I was at the time when it came out. Allen saw the possibility of helping to change peopleâs consciousness. And so did Harry, although they were total opposites in methodology.â
Hal Wilner felt that First Blues was more than just an archival curiosity, and he included some of the Chelsea sessions on his Ginsberg anthology. âIâll admit when I first was slated to produce an album withAllen I was holding my ears,â said Wilner. âYet, itâs amazing how this stuff holds up and just gets better. I felt I needed it for the historical aspectâhereâs Harry Smith producing Allen Ginsberg. But when I went back to those tapes, I couldnât believe how strong it was.â
Were Ginsberg and Smith blue when they made these recordings? Were they stoned? Whatever the mood, Harry allowed himself to be subsumed by Allenâs Rags, Ballads & Harmonium Songs . As a witness to the (painful) birthing of