a point that is
very interesting.”
I did not think I had. It was an asinine joke and
nothing more. Poirot seemed intent on congratulating
me for my most absurd notions.
“One, two, three,” said Poirot as we went up in the
lift. “Harriet Sippel, Room 121. Richard Negus,
Room 238. Ida Gransbury, Room 317. The hotel has a
fourth and a fifth floor also, but our three murder
victims are on the consecutive floors 1, 2 and 3. It is
very neat.” Poirot usually approved of things that
were neat, but he looked worried about this one.
We examined the three rooms, which were
identical in almost every respect. Each contained a
bed, cupboards, a basin with an upturned glass sitting
on one corner, several armchairs, a table, a desk, a
tiled fireplace, a radiator, a larger table over by the
window, a suitcase, clothes and personal effects, and
a dead person.
Each room’s door closed with a thud, trapping me
inside . . .
“Hold his hand, Edward.”
I couldn’t bring myself to look too closely at the
bodies. All three were lying on their backs, perfectly
straight, with their arms flat by their sides and their
feet pointing toward the door. Formally laid out.
(Even writing these words, describing the posture
of the bodies, produces in me an intolerable
sensation. Is it any wonder I could not look closely at
the three victims’ faces for more than a few seconds at
a time? The blue undertone to the skin; the still, heavy
tongues; the shriveled lips? Though I would have
studied their faces in detail rather than look at their
lifeless hands, and I would have done anything at all
rather than wonder what I could not help wondering:
whether Harriet Sippel, Ida Gransbury and Richard
Negus would have wanted somebody to hold their
hands once they were dead, or whether the idea
would have horrified them. Alas, the human mind is a
perverse, uncontrollable organ, and the contemplation
of this matter pained me greatly.)
Formally laid out . . .
A thought struck me with great force. That was
what was so grotesque about these three murder
scenes, I realized: that the bodies had been laid out as
a doctor might lay out his deceased patient, after
tending him in his illness for many months. The
bodies of Harriet Sippel, Ida Gransbury and Richard
Negus had been arranged with meticulous care—or so
it seemed to me. Their killer had ministered to them
after their deaths, which made it all the more chilling
that he had murdered them in cold blood.
No sooner had I had this thought than I told myself
I was quite wrong. It was not ministration that had
taken place here; far from it. I was confusing the
present and the past, mixing up this business at the
Bloxham with my unhappiest childhood memories. I
ordered myself to think only about what was here in
front of me, and nothing else. I tried to see it all
through Poirot’s eyes, without the distortion of my
own experience.
Each of the murder victims lay between a wing-
backed armchair and a small table. On the three tables
were two teacups with saucers (Harriet Sippel’s and
Ida Gransbury’s) and one sherry glass (Richard
Negus’s). In Ida Gransbury’s room, 317, there was a
tray on the larger table by the window, loaded with
empty plates and one more teacup and saucer. This
cup was also empty. There was nothing on the plates
but crumbs.
“Aha,” said Poirot. “So in this room we have two
teacups and many plates. Miss Ida Gransbury had
company for her evening meal, most certainly.
Perhaps she had the murderer’s company. But why is
the tray still here, when the trays have been removed
from the rooms of Harriet Sippel and Richard
Negus?”
“They might not have ordered food,” I said.
“Maybe they only wanted drinks—the tea and the
sherry—and no trays were left in their rooms in the
first place. Ida Gransbury also brought twice as many
clothes with her as the other two.” I gestured toward
the cupboard, which
Shauna Rice-Schober[thriller]