tides. Th e full moon, exercising the entire attractive force of its mass over the landscape, draws the sleeping atoms out of the earth and makes them undulate in the air. Not just atoms, which wouldn’t count for much, but their particles too, among them those of light and the extremely intricate ones of order.
Maybe the tide that night had some effect on Siffoni’s brain, maybe not, we’ll never know. For the truck, it had the curious consequence of depriving it of its color, the red it had had when it left the factory forty years ago and which was now half-faded, though it still shone so brightly at daybreak in the summer, when the birds were singing. And also the color under the paint. It turned transparent, although there was nobody to see it.
When, hours later, Ramón looked in the rearview mirror, he saw a little blue car following along a half-mile behind him. Th e dust had turned transparent too. Th e presence there of the tiny vehicle filled him with uneasiness. Th e uneasiness made him feel pursued. A short while later, they were still separated by the same distance. It didn’t seem difficult to lose the car; he had never seen a car as tiny as that one before, and he doubted it had much of an engine. He accelerated. He would have thought it impossible, because he had the accelerator pressed to the floor already, but nonetheless the truck sped up, by a lot. It shot forward, the little glass truck, like an arrow shot from a bow.
Here I digress. Because, thinking it over, the moon did have an effect on Ramón. It was that he saw himself as a husband. He was a husband like so many, regularly good, and normal, more or less. But what he now saw was that this comfortable role in which he found himself rested entirely on one supposition, which was “I could be worse.” Indeed, there are husbands who beat their wives, or debase them in this or that way and humiliate them, or play all kinds of dirty tricks on them, in general very visibly (nothing is more visible for those contemplating a marriage), all of which culminates in abandonment: there are husbands who leave, who vanish like smoke, lots of them. So even if the husband stays, and persists in his infamies, even so, he “could be worse.” He could leave. But women are not so foolish as to go along with this scenario; it’s evidently “better to be alone than in bad company,” since there are life-threatening situations in which getting rid of a monstrous husband is better than keeping him. Actually the “could be worse” premise is very flexible, and even very demanding; the least flaw could discredit a husband in the eyes of his wife. “He could be worse . . .” only if he is already almost perfect, if his faults are venial, of the humorous type (for example if he doesn’t pull his pants up a half an inch every time he sits down, so that after a while the fabric stretches at the knees). Very well, in this way a hierarchy is established: there are men who are monsters and make life hell for their wives, like drunks, for example; and there are others who don’t, and if a husband is in the latter category he can allow himself the luxury of looking back over his small (and large) defects, sitting in his easy chair in the living room and reading the paper while his wife makes dinner, and feel very sure of himself. So sure of himself that pretty soon he sees opening in front of him, like a marvelous flower, the world of vices that he could, that he can, practice with impunity thanks to his position as a good husband, a good family man. Life allows him this, it’s for him and only him. Wouldn’t it be a shame, a crime, to waste an opportunity like that? Th e specter of dirty tricks is his Jacob’s ladder: each step will have its subtle dialectic of “I could be worse,” and a lifetime won’t be long enough for him to reach the top, the monster.
Well then, Ramón Siffoni had a vice. He was a gambler. Marriage had made him a gambler, but the game had