youâre suggesting: that HARLIE has invented, or is still inventing, new experiences, new emotions. If theyâre beyond us, then we donât have anything to relate them toâand weâll get them as garbage. The point is that we canât tell if heâs actually experiencing something appropriateâor if heâs just insane. And thatâs the real issue. He has to work in our world; we donât have to work in his.â
âYouâre right.â Auberson agreed. âThe sanity issue is the question. Unfortunately, the only one qualified to judge is the one whose sanity is in question. You got any ideas?â
Handley shook his head. âYou know, I could have opened up a nice little software store in San Jose and my biggest problem would have been how many copies to order of Alien Stompers From Jupiter .â
âYou knew the job was dangerous when you took it.â
âNo, I didnât.â Handley retreated into his beer again. He said sadly, âI think I preferred the implications of failure to this. This isnâtâquantifiable. Weâve built the first real artificial intelligence in the world; heâs either insane or brilliant and we canât tell the difference.â
âThat pretty well sums it up, doesnât it?â
âWe could always ask him,â Handley said glumly.
âActually. . . Iâve been thinking about that all day. If HARLIE has invented a new emotion or a new experience, then he will not be completeâor should I say ârational,â at least not by our standardsâuntil he has communicated that experience. And that means that if we do ask him, then we have to be receptive. We have to be willing to experience it tooâhowever or whatever it is.â He added, âItâs a pretty scary idea to me.â
âI canât conceive of a new emotion, Aubie, or a new experience, any more than I can conceive of a new color. I donât think anyone can.â
âRight. If you could imagine it, then it wouldnât be beyond your experience, would it? Thatâs whatâs scaryâthe idea that there are experiences beyond what you know. If you could experience them, it would certainly shift your perceptions, wouldnât it?â
Handley shook his head again, this time more in confusion than denial.
âOn the other hand . . .â continued Auberson, âif heâs a clever enough paranoid, he could still produce the same effect, because heâll be able to convince you that you are experiencing something, and youâll never know the difference. Did you see the invisible gorilla at the table in the corner?â
Handley didnât turn around to look. âNo. I did not see the invisible gorilla.â
âSee, that proves heâs there.â
âI see your point.â
âNo, you donât. Itâs invisible too.â
âDonât do that, Aubieââ
âWe used to play head games like this all the time in school. Theyâre best when youâre stoned. Thatâs when theyâre most real. Itâs all about reality, isnât it? If you can get enough people to see the invisible gorilla, then it really is there, isnât it?â
âOnly until somebody realizes that heâs not wearing any clothesâno, stop. This is making my head hurt.â
âItâs something R. D. Laing once said, Don. If you have just one person you can talk to, then youâre not really crazy.â
âYeah, Iâve heard that one too. Either youâre not really crazy, or you have two crazy people sitting and talking to each other.â
âThatâs my concern,â Auberson agreed. âThatâs what I meant when I said we donât really have a way to test the theory. At best, this could still be a very dangerous line of researchâfor the researcher. It would be like signing up for one of those trainings. This