first.â
âThree possibilities come to mind. That is, three human possibilities.â
âAnd how many in human possibilities?â
âAll of them. Letâs take a walk. . . .â
The corridor outside was empty. Auberson leaned against a wall and turned to face Handley. Handley folded his arms across his chest and asked, âSo?â
âSo.â
The rumpled man nodded. âUh-huh. I know exactly what you mean.â
âNoâitâs just . . . I have too many ideas. I donât know where to begin.â
Auberson turned and pointed at the door. âLook at his name: âHuman Analog Replicationââespecially the human analog part. There have to be human analogs for what heâs doing.â
âThereâs a second part to that name, Aubie. âLethetic Intelligence Engine.ââ
âI know. Lethesis is the study of language-created paradigms. Iâve seen Minskyâs notes too. âThe language paradigm creates its own internal realityâwhich cannot be abandoned without abandoning the language as well.ââ Auberson added, â Therefore , HARLIE can neither be experiencing or expressing anything that is not already a part of the language concept-set. . . .â
âRight.â
âWrongâwhat if heâs breaking out of the paradigm? What if what heâs doing is somehow a way to abandon the concept-set weâve given him?â
âMm,â said Handley. âSo weâre still stuck with last nightâs question. Arenât we?â He shoved his hands into his pockets and looked at the floor. Abruptly, he looked up. âYou said something about three human possibilities . . .â
âOh, yeah. Equivalents, really.â He ticked them off on his fingers. âOneâseizures. Twoâdrugs. Threeâmasturbation.â
âHm. Interesting.â
âThatâs what he said too. . . .â
They were silent a moment, waiting until a service technician passed. They studied each otherâs faces. Handley looked too young for this job. Most programmers did.
Handley spoke first, âIt canât be seizuresâthatâs a hardware problem. Weâd have spotted it in the monitors.â
Auberson shook his head. âWhen I was in school, one of my study partners had to take medication for epilepsy, and one time, while we were studying for a psych exam, we started talking about how nobody ever really knew what anybody else knew, only the roughest equivalent; so I asked him, what did it feel like when he had a seizure? Among other things, he said, âIf it werenât for the pain, it would be beautiful.â
âMm,â said Handley. âBut stillâa seizure would have to be hardware-related . . .â And then he added, âWouldnât it?â
âIâm not so sure. I know the logic doesnât allow for itâin theoryâbut maybe thereâs some kind of a loop or a feedback that happens . . . I donât know. I donât even know where to start looking. The only machine on which we could model the process is HARLIE. And we donât dare try.â
Handley frowned. âHuh? Why not?â
âIâd rather not have HARLIE know how weâre checking him. If we run this test, heâll know.â
âBut if youâre rightââ
âIf Iâm wrong , weâll have lowered our chances of validating the other two possibilities. Heâll start hiding . If he does that, then weâll be creating the seed for a paranoid syndrome. And you know what happens when you let one of those run out of control for a few weeks?â
âYeah. Itâs a black hole. Pretty soon everything is caught in its gravity and the whole personality is skewed.â
âWe run the same risk if this thing is drugs or masturbation. We canât let him think that what heâs doing is wrongâeven if it is, or we