was located on the Hudson River about forty-five minutes north of Manhattan. No doubt beautiful, with impeccable architecture: the center was a darling of both hospitals and pharmaceutical companies, and was lavishly funded.
âChris!â came Goodkindâs cheery voice. âI canât believe it. I havenât heard from you in, what, six years?â
âMust be that long.â
âHow are you enjoying private practice?â
âThe hours are better.â
âIâll bet. I always wondered when youâd give up riding with the cavalry, settle down in some nice, lucrative town. Youâre practicing in Fairfield, right?â
âStamford.â
âYes, of course. Close to Greenwich, Southport, New Canaan. All full of rich, dysfunctional couples, no doubt. Excellent choice.â Old U. Penn classmates like Goodkind had been divided in their opinions on Lash joining the FBI. Some seemed envious. Others shook their heads, unable to comprehend why heâd willingly take on such a stressful, physically demanding, potentially dangerous job when his doctorate entitled him to something a lot cushier. When he did leave the FBI, heâd been careful to let them believe greed was the motivating factorârather than the tragedy that so abruptly ended both his law enforcement career and his marriage.
âYou hear much from Shirley?â Goodkind asked.
âNope.â
âShame you two split up. It didnât have to do with, what, that Edmund Wyre business, did it? I read about that in the paper.â
Lash was careful to keep his voice from betraying the pain that, even three years later, mention of that name could evoke. âNo, nothing like that.â
âHorrible. Horrible. Mustâve been rough on you.â
âWasnât easy.â Lash began to feel sorry heâd called. How could he have forgotten Goodkindâs curiosity, his love of prying into the personal affairs of others?
âI picked up that book of yours,â Goodkind said. â
Congruency
. Excellent stuff, though of course you were writing for the unwashed.â
âI wanted to sell more than a dozen copies.â
âAnd?â
âSold two dozen, at least.â
Goodkind laughed.
âI read your recent article, too,â Lash went on. âIn the
American Journal of Neurobiology
. âCognitive Reappraisal and Agenerative Suicide.â Nicely argued.â
âOne thing about my position here at the center is I can specialize in the research of my choice.â
âI was also interested in some of your other recent papers. âReuptake Inhibitors and Elder Suicide,â for example.â
âReally?â Goodkind sounded surprised. âI had no idea you were keeping such close tabs.â
âI infer from the articles that, in addition to the lab research, youâve interviewed quite a number of suicide attempters?â
âWell, I havenât had a chance to talk with too many suicide
completers
.â Goodkind chuckled at his little joke.
âIncluding survivors of double suicides?â
âOf course.â
âThen thereâs something Iâm looking into that might interest you. In fact, I could use your advice. These friends of a patient of mine, a couple. Committed double suicide recently.â
âSuccessfully?â
âThere are some unusual aspects to the pathology.â
âSuch as?â
Lash pretended to hesitate. âWell, what if we turned it around, and you speculatedâbased on your research, of courseâwhat the motivating factors might have been. Perform a psychological autopsy on the couple. Iâll fill in the blanks.â
There was a brief silence. âSure, why not. What were their ages?â
âEarly thirties.â
âEmployment history?â
âStable.â
âPsychiatric history? Mood disorders?â
âNone known.â
âSuicidal