any sign of smugness, simply as a
54 — F l i g h t o f A q u av i t
matter of fact.
“Oh? How do you know that?” Should I sug-
gest a guest spot on Alberta’s late night TV psy-
chic show?
“You said the envelope was presented to ‘him,’
so your client is male. Only the winners of the
Businessperson of the Year Award are presented
with an envelope. The other winners receive only
an engraved plaque. The tradition of physically
presenting the cheque on the evening of the cere-
mony—rather than at a later date—began only six
years ago,” she told me. “I hope you don’t mind, I
just don’t wish to pretend to not know something
that I do.”
I smiled. “Thank you.”
She managed a thin-lipped smile in return.
“Obviously I am interested in who could have
known the identity of the winner and also had
access to place the blackmail note into the enve-
lope that was presented to that winner. It’s an
issue of physical access as well as access to specif-
ic knowledge.”
A curt nod from Lois. “I understand. First, let’s
discuss physical access.” Lois Vermont was not
the president of a business association for nothing.
She got right to it. “I have been with the SBA for
over ten years and I can tell you with a high level
of certainty that in the last six years, since we
began presenting the envelope along with the
plaque to the Businessperson of the Year, the
process has remained unchanged. We do things
exactly the same way, year after year. It works, so
why change it? I prepare the envelope in question.
Anthony Bidulka — 55
The cheque is actually a dummy cheque. It looks
real, but it isn’t. It’s only for show. We do that for
security reasons, because we know there are
opportunities when the cheque is not under con-
stant surveillance, that it could be stolen. We are a
small organization and we are not in the financial
position to maintain a fleet of security guards dur-
ing the awards ceremony or any other time.”
“Of course, that makes sense.”
“I’m glad you think so.” I wasn’t certain if she
meant it or was patronizing me. I decided I didn’t
need to know the answer. “As I mentioned, I pre-
pare the dummy cheque. I always do it the morn-
ing of the ceremony.”
“Are you sure?”
“Absolutely. I am a firm believer in lists and a
system of check-off procedures. Preparing the
dummy cheque is on my morning of the ceremo-
ny procedure list. There would be no reason for
me to vary from this list.”
I had no doubt this was true.
“So as early as the morning of the ceremony
someone might have access to the cheque in its
envelope?” I asked.
“No, I don’t believe so. After I prepare the
cheque and place it in its envelope…which, by the
way, remains unsealed. We don’t want winners
having to fumble around with a sealed envelope.”
“Very sensible.”
“Yes. After the cheque is prepared and I put it
in the envelope, I place that envelope in my office
safe along with several other pieces of important
documentation that I’ve prepared for that
56 — F l i g h t o f A q u av i t
evening. So, unless your blackmailer is also a safe
cracker, they would not have access to the enve-
lope at that time. In the past six years my safe has
not been broken into, or at least not in a manner I
could detect. No one else has the combination for
that safe.”
“I think your conclusion is a sound one.
When’s the first time the envelope is available for
someone to tamper with without someone else
noticing?”
“At the end of my business day I retrieve the
documents, including the envelope, from the safe
in my office and I take them home with me as I do
not return to the office before going to the hotel
where the event is held. So, indeed, if you care to
suspect members of my family, I suppose it is pos-
sible that my husband, daughter or babysitter
could have slipped a blackmail note into the enve-
lope while